It is interesting that article denying 73 page " 1998 us doj epa cofidential for settlement purposes only document" is wrong just because GAO did a report about how military handled waste (but was clearly stayed NOT to be an investigation into what asarco had done).  How did this article move to #1 spot 🤔😃😂😵. 

And also amazing to see this blog ( if you search for "asarco secret document"), pull up clean up trustee work ( he was directed to not deal with the invoices in the 1998  73 page confidential for setylement purposes only document between adarco, epa and us doj.

For a long time- yrs- if you googled "asarco secret document" you pulled up a lot of epgtlo hits ( my blog, not associated with GTLO).  Now, the "politically correct detours around this inconvenience of what the nytimes published 10/06 are getting google-higher and higher placements.

A coincidence? 
Just read the 73 page document and nytimes article for yourself and decide. Go to the source: the 73 pg doc and the nytimes front page coverage. 
Sierra blanca dump site activist bill guerra addington was correct when he said that the 73 page report was a national story.   He said if published non nationally that "they" ?? Would bury the document.

In 1998 when that secret asarco epa us doj document was drafted, the us epa had publicly reported that el pado tx was most radioactive city in usa- hotter beta radiation in water and soils thanneven oakridge tn or hanford wa.