Asarco finally admitted to having buried 55 gallon drums of hazardous waste....

"But as to the company’s recent reversal of position – in which Asarco now admits to having buried some barrels – Arrigo said he is “quite surprised.” He said he’s now looking forward to seeing what CRG’s lawsuit and ground work uncovers.

“I’ll be real interested to find out what’s down there,” Arrigo said."

(Asarco Troy mine, 2003)

" Specifically, Meyer said Asarco’s tailings impoundment, which captures waste from the mining operation, was leaking into nearby Lake Creek.

He also said the company bypassed part of its wastewater treatment plant, sending sewage and other waste directly into the tailings impoundment. And, perhaps most surprising, Meyer claimed Asarco was burying 55-gallon drums of hazardous waste in what he termed “midnight burials.”

All of those claims have been disputed by the company, and the matter has recently found its way into federal court. But long before the first motions were filed, some eight years ago, to be exact, Jim Meyer blew his whistle in the Troy woods, expecting state regulators to hear his alarm."

http://www.missoulian.com/specials/troy/troy03.html

Environmental Radiation Data Report 96 (EPA RADNET) October - December 1998

See "environmental radiation data" http://www.epa.gov/narel/radnet/aboutus.html

smooth metal cyclinders being unloaded (by crane-mounted-magnet) from railcar at Asarco El Paso spring 2005

Gamma Scout Readings taken at Smelter Cemetery Asarco - spike is at a grave with uranium-green-tiles

LANL 'blue plume' tritium study done during summer mid 1990's of unnamed source at El Paso TX

Old Postcard photo of El Paso Asarco smelter showing Smeltertown and Rio Grande

Smelter Cemetery next to Asarco El Paso

A giant burial mound in Ruston holds the ruins of Asarco's copper smelter...

The Herald - Everett, Wash. - www.HeraldNet.com

Published: Sunday, March 19, 2006

Asarco leaving a toxic legacy

By Susan Gordon
The (Tacoma) News Tribune

TACOMA - A giant burial mound in Ruston holds the ruins of Asarco's copper smelter: bricks, mortar and soil so saturated with arsenic and lead that the crypt they are buried in will have to be monitored indefinitely to prevent leaks.

Asarco is poised to sell its waterfront property to a Lacey developer, including the tomb and the responsibility for the hazardous waste in it.

An estimated $45 million in cleanup work remains to be done. But the developer, MC Construction, is expected to assume responsibility only for half, depending on how negotiations with federal regulators go.

Still untouched are as many as 500 contaminated residential yards, adjacent industrial properties and nearby aquatic lands.

The former Fortune 500 company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in 2005, and might be able to walk away from some of the nation's most vexing and expensive environmental cleanups.

That would burden taxpayers with more than $1 billion in obligations. And some regulators say that estimate is low.

The remaining cleanup in Ruston and Tacoma is just a fraction of Asarco's heritage nationwide. Asarco has told a federal bankruptcy judge that state and federal officials blame the company for contamination at 94 sites in 21 states.

Creditors fighting over the remains of the company could raid a small trust fund established to pay for cleaning up some of the worst pollution problems, officials said. But because trust fund distributions are prioritized based on human health risks, cleanup efforts in the Pacific Northwest could take a back seat to such places as:

* Omaha, Neb., home of the largest residential lead cleanup in the United States.

* El Paso, Texas, where contamination from a mothballed smelter and its 800-foot smokestack extends into Mexico and New Mexico.
see:
http://heraldnet.com/stories/06/03/19/100loc_a1asarco001.cfm

Guess What? Something that ASARCO didn't tell you

Unbeknownst to many in El Paso and the State of Texas, The El Paso Independent School District (EPISD), currently has pending litigation against ASARCO “In The United States Bankruptcy Court For The Southern District Of Texas, Corpus Christi Division,” Case No. 05-21207, Chapter 11. This to be “Jointly Administered” hearing is set for August 6-10, 2007 at 10:00am.

 The creditor in the case (EPISD) claims that the debtor, (ASARCO) American Smelting and Refining Company LLC, et al., is liable for the claim amount of $5,685,169.39 for the “Removal and Disposal of Contaminated Soil at 4 EPISD Schools [which were] tested and shown to have elevated lead and arsenic in the December 2001 report, Removal Assessment Report for El Paso County Metals, El Paso County, Texas, by Roy Weston, Inc.”[1]

The creditor (EPISD) claims that the debtor (ASARCO) “has known, or through the exercise of reasonable care should have known at all relevant times that pollutants have been escaping from its facility, exposing [EPISD] to a foreseeable risk of harm, but have failed to warn [EPISD] of the hazards caused by such pollution…”[2]

EPISD claims that “ASARCO “has at all relevant time owed the [EPISD] a duty to implement in a timely manner all reasonable measures to eliminate harmful and unpleasant pollutants from emissions that enter the areas where the [EPISD] owns property and schools; d) eliminate all unreasonable risks to property and schools owned by [EPISD] posed by the operation of the plant…”[3]

EPISD claims, “ASARCO has exposed [EPISD] to harmful pollution through reckless and wanton disregard for the consequences to [EPISD] and others similarly situated.”[4]  The latter being made up of student and neighborhood constituents.

EPISD claims “[e]missions from [Debtor] ASARCO’s facilities have periodically exposed properties and schools owned by [EPISD] to levels of pollutants that have interfered with the quiet enjoyment of its private property interests and with its enjoyment of public properties in affected areas.”[5]

EPISD claims that “ASARCO has caused noxious and potentially harmful fumes, particles, vapors and smoke to enter onto properties in which [EPISD] has an interest…The entry of pollution caused by [Debtor] ASARCO onto [EPISD] properties continues and will continue to harm [EPISD] unless abated by injunctive and declaratory relief.”[6]

Although the particulars are extensive, the issue is not as complex as it may seem. The EPISD and a group of affected parties filed a civil suit in El Paso County Court At Law Number Seven (Cause No. 2001-2478); When ASARCO filed for Chapter 11 status in 2005, EPISD, in pursuance of the cleanup costs incurred by the citizenry of El Paso, subsequently filed the claim for damages (Case No. 05-21207).

As we have seen, ASARCO’s emissions of lead and arsenic have been detrimental to El Paso, and have caused significant danger to our public schools and their students therein. The pending case against ASARCO in bankruptcy court stems from the likelihood that they were negligent while operating in El Paso and that air quality subsequently has detrimental effects upon school property, including putting students at further undue risk than should have been allowed.

EPISD is concerned about the health and welfare of its student populations and is obligated by law to provide an education in a safe and secure environment. Exposing our children to the emissions from the operations of ASARCO undermines the principles of goodwill and faith in mankind. 

It is in this and other pertinent factors that the people of El Paso petition the TCEQ not to issue Air Permit No. 20345. 

Respectfully,  

Scott Comar

---

[1] U.S. Bankruptcy Court, The Southern District Of Texas Corpus Christi Division: El Paso Independent School District’s Update Of Claim Amount And Designation Of Experts And Witnesses And Designation Of Documents Supporting Export Reports And Exhibits For Hearing Relating To Docket No. 3675 Estimation of ASARCO LLC’s Environmental Liabilities, 24 May 2007 ( Case 05-21207, Document 4803), p. 1.   

[2] El Paso County Court At Law Number Seven, El Paso County, Texas, Plaintiff Intervener El Paso Independent School District’s Original Petition, Plea In Intervention And Jury Demand, EPISD et al.  v. ASARCO, Cause No. 2001-2478, Filed in TXSB on 24 May 2007 (Case 05-21207, Document 4803-3), p. 5.

[3] Ibid. p. 5.

[4] Ibid. p. 7.

[5] Ibid. p. 7.

[6] Ibid. p. 8.

  

Sick 'Em, City of El Paso!: Going After Asarco,,by Chris Cummings

Posted on June 21, 2007

If (a big “IF”) anyone could remediate the wasteland around the Asarco plant one day (see Asarco bankruptcy and the multi-millions they already owe to dozens of states around the country), or even today, what role will Asarco play in the clean up? They’ll leave a tip on the table and say ‘Thanks, we had a nice meal here for a hundred years, but we are finished.’ They won’t ask for the tab. They will dine and dash. But as a courtesy, as a nod to the working men and women (whom they will one day employ…and abandon), whom they now have working for them, spinning the benefits of the reopening because their union has worked out a deal (see United Steel Workers [USW] Union’s full page ad(s) in the El Paso Times over the past few months), for you my friends, they will eventually leave unemployment and heartache (I’m not even going to get into the health consequences.)..........
http://newspapertree.com/opinion/1490-sick-em-city-of-el-paso-going-after-asarco

Asarco Rubber Lake breaking on 9/4/06 pouring 200,000 gallons of concentrated poisons and storm-water into the old american canal. The canal is our drinking water- it is pulled into a 48" pipe into the Canal St. Water Treatment plant and then the plant pumps the water up the mountain to distribute it throughout El Paso.

Letter to the Editor, El Paso Inc. sent 2/12/07 to Editor and EPWU Attorney Andron

Thank you for the article and photo about the repair of the old upper American canal's broken panel, showing the Jobe Concrete truck pouring cement for the new panel, near the American Dam (established by International Treaty for the delivery of waters to Mexico and the USA). http://www.elpasoinc.com/showArticle.asp?articleId=971

We know from the IBWC's reports that 24 million dollars worth of hazardous waste is in the soil beneath those panels right there. Some of it is odorless and tasteless. We know from the EPWU's water reports above and below that buckled-panel that it is leaking into that water still flowing past the feet of those men, who are now exposed to it. Those men are not wearing masks, most are not wearing gloves -- no one is wearing white environmental suits. Some of those men will wash their clothes at home or in commercial laundromats, and family members (maybe pregnant wives or growing kids) will handle the contaminated clothing.
We know that between mid-March and mid-October that El Paso will get its drinking water from this canal; and, that contamination still leaks
through the old-joints and the weep-holes into the canal where ground-water touches the liner. The contamination will pass along over 70 miles of agricultural irrigation canal. The farmland below Asarco has been called an "arsenic time-bomb" in at least one research paper.

Our community knows that Asarco burned illegal hazardous waste for nearly a decade just a stone's throw away from this liner. Smeltertown, in the background of this photo on the EP Inc., had 18 inches of soil removed nearly 40 years ago, for just the Pb (lead) content alone.

The panels in that old canal were made over 70 years ago of 3 inches of concrete laid over re-bar, just like in that photo - and layered in two directions. They should be made of 4 inches of reinforced concrete. This is a patch-job it appears, and the rest of the 3 miles and 400 or so panels are still in danger of failing. The panels' failure was predicted years ago.

The State Department in spring of '05 reviewed the various IBWC sites and said that the employees at American Dam next to old-smeltertown were sick, and that they were not getting independent medical review from this region.
How long will our regulatory agencies responsible for our well-being continue to conceal its conflicts of interests from this community and pass along the responsibilities to the next generation--- "pass-the-buck", in cancers, lead exposure, arsenic trioxides and actinide exposures?

Heather McMurray
El Paso, TX

Radioactive metal smelting plant

Metal smelting plant was taken at its word

Part of: Leningrad NPP

Although Sosnovy Bor authorities have withdrawn a suit banning the import of radioactive metal waste into the town, Ekomet-S, the importer of that waste, has agreed on its own to cease such imports for the time being, though the company says it doesn't want to hold off forever. Rashid Alimov, 22/07-2002

On July 31st, St Petersburg's Court of Arbitration will be again considering the suit filed by the authorities of Sosnovy Bor against Ekomet-S.

At the previous arbitration session, which was the second, Sosnovy Bor authorities withdrew one of their suits.

Ekomet-S
The radioactive metal smelting plant Ekomet-S is situated on the premises of the Leningrad Nuclear Power plant (LAES), only few hundred meters away from the shore of the Baltic Sea shore and four kilometres from Sosnovy Bor's 60,000 inhabitants. The closed nuclear town itself is located 80km from St Petersburg.

The plant was built secretly and without an environmental impact study, which is required by Russian legislation.

The facility, which is devoted to the smelting and decontamination of radioactive metals for resale on the open market, was built by the Ministry for Nuclear Energy — the notorious Minatom — and fissile fuel monopolists hoping to cash in on the smelting of radioactive metal waste from nuclear power plants across Russia. Gazprom-bank invested $10m in the project.

The very fact that a private plant is located at the territory of the state-run LAES may be considered a violation of the current legislation. In late 2001, a group of LAES security guards published an open letter in which they claimed that since the opening of the smelting plant, they had been exposed to radiation. Their contracts, they noted, had not stipulated they would be working in conditions that exposed them to radiation hazards.............
http://www.bellona.org/english_import_area/international/russia/npps/leningrad/24950

Monday 6-25 at 10:30 AM Signing ceremony at City Hall 2nd floor chambers

Invite for JAC Members: signing of Emergency
Plan for Hazardous Chemicals (USA EPA
Administrator to witness)

Texas may rule on Asarco copper smelter in August

Fri Jun 22, 2007 6:13PM EDT

MEXICO CITY, June 22 (Reuters) - Texas could give U.S. copper miner Asarco the green light to restart its mothballed El Paso copper smelter any time from August onward, state environmental authorities said on Friday.

Andrea Morrow, spokeswoman for the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, said no date was set for the hearing.

"The earliest it could be scheduled is August and the commision can grant the permit, deny the permit, or do something else," she said by telephone.

Reopening the 150,000 short ton per year smelter, built in the 19th century and closed amid low copper prices in 1999, would be an important financial boost for bankrupt Asarco, owned by Mexico City-based Grupo Mexico (GMEXICOB.MX: Quote, Profile, Research).

But a vocal lobby that includes environmental groups, some local officials and U.S. Rep. Silvestre Reyes oppose the smelter because of worries about air quality....
see:
http://www.reuters.com/article/bondsNews/idUSN2240060020070622

ConTop was a cover for the illegal burning of unmanifested poisons for profit (reply to El Paso Times article about UTEP economic study concerning ASARCO

-------- Original Message --------

Subject:	ConTop was a cover for the illegal burning of unmanifested poisons for profit (reply to El Paso Times article about UTEP economic study concerning ASARCO)
Date:	Sun, 03 Jun 2007 22:29:34 -0600
To:	lgilo[at]elpasotimes.com

in 1992, after more than 100 years in operation, Asarco invested $100 million to modernize the El Paso plant using a new technology called ConTop which, officials said, increased production to 150,000 pounds of copper annually and reduced air emissions by more than 90 percent."

Dear Mr. Gilot,

ConTop reduced Sulfur dioxide, but it also did something called "energy recovery".  It was designed to burn non-traditional metal-bearing materials like shredded automobiles and sludge to generate heat to smelt traditional ores.  So, Asarco secretly shipped unrecorded (unmanifested) poisons into its plant and incinerated them for profit - they never intended to get any metals out of those materials.  The EPA tracked down 5000 tons -- enough to prove that materials from Rocky Mt. Arsenal and other sources had no metals in their materials for recovery -- the smelter never intended to smelt any metals.  It was an unlicensed hazardous waste incinerator in the middle of the Paso del Norte region and it poisoned us. (see attached article).  And, by the EPA's own admission, Asarco's business of incinerating hazardous waste was a big money maker for the smelter.  The EPA, the Department of Justice and Asarco kept that information hidden from our community for eight years, until we got the document from the D.O.J. and released it 10/2006.

So, while ConTop reduced some air emissions, it gave off tremendous toxic amounts of materials that the smelter and our environmental agencies never tested for.  We know that their brine concentrator, for example, was rated to handle Low Level Radioactive waste; and that from Asarco's own reports it handled chemical weapons quench water.

Thank you,
Heather McMurray

"Asarco commissioned a study on the economic impact of the proposed reopening of the El Paso copper smelter. Here are some of the result:
In El Paso
# 291 new direct jobs.
# 1,819 new indirect jobs.
# $73 million in new labor income per year from direct and indirect jobs.
# $1.16 billion in regional economic output.
At the Amarillo refinery
# 44 new jobs.
# 286 new indirect jobs.
# $11 million in new labor income per year from direct and indirect jobs.
# $134 million regional economic output.
In Texas
# 334 new direct jobs.
# 2,264 new indirect jobs.
# $92.7 million in new labor income per year from direct and indirect jobs.
# $1.35 billion in regional economic output."

THE NEGATIVE COSTS TO OPENING:
#  50 million to clean-up a site like Helena Montana (El Paso site is worse)
# 1 Billion to clean-up Asarco contaminated sites in the USA
# 24 million alone to clean up the Asarco contamination beneath the old upper american
canal by the smelter in El Paso TX
#  Dying and ill workers (some costing $1000/day in experimental drugs to stay alive)
#  hidden costs of asthma, people dying slowly from C.O.P.D., costs of medical care/oxygen
#  hidden costs to police, schools and other public agencies from children exposed to heavy metals
    at an early early age causing explosive-anger, learning disabilities, emotional disabilities
#  hidden costs to residents of this region from brain, nasal, skin and other cancers
#  hidden costs to families whose babies suffered birth defects from the poisons

TCEQ failing to enforce identification and cleanup of contamination from illegal burning of toxic waste by Asarco El Paso

To:  TCEQ complaint

sb:  TCEQ failing to enforce identification and cleanup of contamination from illegal burning of toxic waste by Asarco El Paso

I am filing this as a formal complaint asking the TCEQ to run a full spectrometer analysis of the material dredged from the bottom of the 100 year old Asarco pond and sent to TX US ecology for storage, with the purpose of identifying the chemical compounds left here from the illegal sham-recycling by Asarco.  I also ask that a full spectrometer analysis be done of the present-bottom of that same pond at the Asarco site and where the most runoff would have contacted soil during the 9-4-06 collapse of Asarco rubber lake.  Also, please run an analysis from a scraping of the Asarco primary smoke-stack; and from the Ionics brine concentrator's concentrate chambers.  This analysis should include ash-incineration-technique to check for alpha and beta particles.

High level officials in the TCEQ and the EPA are violating honest services provision of the mail and wire fraud act by

• failure to identify and enforce cleanup of the toxic poisons incinerated/stored by Asarco El Paso from its subsidiary in Corpus Christi, TX.
• pretending to carry on a legitimate permitting process on the El Paso Asarco smelter while continuing to ignore that this site has NOT BEEN DECONTAMINATED from the burning of these wastes
• failure to identify the wastes left here from this incineration/handling
• failure to explain the resulting health effects to the community  
  

Public officials have known that these toxins are now in our water, the alluvial sediments and aquifer.  The TCEQ is failing to continue metal testing of the river below Asarco saying it "isn't necessary any longer".  The TCEQ is failing to identify the toxins left in our water supply from the decade of illegal Asarco sham-recycling.