Hafnium

Search "hafnium" (found in nuclear plant control rods) within blog search gadget on right column

Saturday, February 22, 2025

Fresno County plans to inspect biological research labs. It follows Reedley crisis December 12, 2023

Fresno County plans to inspect biological research labs. It follows Reedley crisis

December 12, 2023 

Still reeling from the discovery a year ago of a biological laboratory operating secretly – and illegally – in the city of Reedley, Fresno County supervisors unanimously gave initial approval to an ordinance requiring annual inspections of any privately-funded biological research labs that are not regulated under federal law.

The new “Fresno County Infectious Materials Ordinance” passed on a 5-0 vote Tuesday, paving the way for a second reading and final approval on Jan. 9.

Joe Prado, the county’s assistant health department director, said inspections could begin as soon as February or March in cities that ink agreements with Fresno County for health inspectors to conduct unannounced visits to check on their compliance with regulations for biological or infectious disease materials or hazardous waste.

The new ordinance would not apply to labs at hospitals, medical clinics or doctors offices, or commercial diagnostic testing labs, which are already regulated under the federal Clinical Laboratories Improvement Amendments law, or those that have been issued waivers to those regulations.

But it would apply to private labs that receive no public funds for their work. “We don’t think there are a lot of these private labs, but we’re going to find out under this ordinance,” Public Health Director David Luchini said.

WHAT TRIGGERED THIS ORDINANCE?

It was in December 2022 when Jesalyn Harper, a code enforcement officer with the city of Reedley, noticed a green garden hose sticking through the back exterior wall of a large warehouse in the heart of downtown, a code violation. In an inspection, Harper noticed dozens of refrigerators and freezers and an array of laboratory equipment in storage, as well as hundreds of laboratory mice. She also spotted other code violations including electrical modifications made to provide power to the refrigerators and freezers.

The lab was later discovered to be linked to a pair of Chinese-owned companies, Univeral Meditech Inc. and Prestige Biotech Inc., that were operating without a business license after abruptly relocating from Fresno following a dispute with their landlord.

Eventually, collaborative inspections by city, county, state and federal agencies resulted in the closure of the warehouse in March 2023. Among the materials discovered in the lab were an array of viral, bacterial and parasitic agents including chlamydia, E. coli, streptococcus, Hepatitis B and C, human herpes, HIV (the virus that causes AIDS), rubella [measles] and malaria,  [also ebola, sars cov2 and others marked in Chinese - that CDC refused to handle and asked they be destroyed, i suppose]  as well as numerous laboratory chemicals and cases upon cases of various medical testing kits, including pregnancy tests and COVID-19 tests.

Ultimately, investigations led to the arrest in October of the alleged operator of the lab, a Chinese resident named Jia Bei Zhu, who also goes by the name David He. He faces federal charges of manufacturing and distributing misbranded medical devices and making false statements to federal investigators. Zhu remains in the Fresno County Jail as his case moves through the federal court process.

The discovery of the biological agents at an unlicensed lab stirred a furor of concern, not only for public safety from possible contamination from the materials, but also exposed what Reedley city leaders and county officials described as a loophole in federal laboratory regulations, from which privately funded labs are exempt.

PLUGGING A REGULATORY LOOPHOLE

Earlier this year, the city of Fresno took its own steps to adopt an ordinance requiring code-enforcement inspections of private biological laboratories in an effort to prevent a planned return to Fresno by Universal Meditech.

With Tuesday’s action, county health officials expressed hoped that others among Fresno County’s 15 incorporated cities would enter agreements to allow county inspectors to conduct visits to labs that would fall under the new ordinance in each city. Prado said it will be up to each city to scrutinize operating statements from companies obtaining business tax permits for any references to laboratory operations. The county will provide cities with a link to a national database website of CLIA-regulated labs. “If they’re not on that list, they can refer them to us” for inspections, Prado said.

“There’s going to have to be training in every city that signs on for what to look for,” Prado said. “It’s going to be like a welcome package for the cities that sign on.”

In instances like the Reedley lab, however, in which the operator surreptitiously moved in without getting a business license from the city, it will require each community’s code-enforcement inspectors to keep an eye out for unusual activity. “We all have to be vigilant in our communities,” Prado said. “If there’s a new business or something going on, and people see medical waste trucks, that could be something. … It’s going to be the code enforcement officers out there looking, and if they see something, they can refer it to us” for inspections.

Beside annual inspections, there will be annual site certifications to ensure that labs are operating in compliance with their various permits, Luchini said. “If they don’t have a permit, it means this lab is out of compliance” and subject to operations being suspended or shut down.

PUSHING FOR FEDERAL LAB LEGISLATION

While the local ordinance is a step for Fresno County, it will carry no weight for other counties either in California or across the country. That’s why Zieba and others are advocating for federal legislation to extend the CLIA regulations to cover privately operated labs.

“Why we want national legislation is that is not just to protect us from the Prestige Biotechs and Universal Meditechs,” Zieba said Tuesday, “but if Congress doesn’t take action to have a blanket regulation covering the country, what this country will end up with is a patchwork of regulations that will harm private research and development labs.”

Zieba described the new Fresno County ordinance as “an incredibly important stop-gap measure, a step to keep this county safe while we wait for the federal government to keep our nation safe.”

In a video message, Rep. Jim Costa, D-Fresno, said a report by the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party on the Reedley lab investigation also noted gaps in federal law “that really allow bad actors to take advantage of the current system.”

Costa added that he is working with other members of Congress to strengthen federal oversight of private labs and greater accountability for federal agencies tasked with enforcing the regulations.

In the meantime, however, Costa said, “this ordinance really will provide a template for other counties throughout California and working throughout the country to ensure we have a seamless effort of oversight for public safety between the local, state and federal officials."

Friday, February 14, 2025

Pdf Asbestos in Talc (and other minerals) Breakout Session B November 28, 2018

 "Asbestos in Talc Breakout Session B November 28, 2018

Nov 28, 2018 — bentonite asbestos, another amphibole, implicated in the. 15. Ural ... "

U.S. Food and Drug Administration (.gov)

https://www.fda.gov

PDF

PDF: (asarco el paso had asbestos on site) Asbestos in Talc Breakout Session B November 28, 2018

Tuesday, January 28, 2025

2006 lead (Pb) values


 See the 2006 lead (Pb) values, the beryllium, mercury, arsenic etc found at canal street water plant, a secondary treatment plant that SPEG (sunland park environmental group, led by taylor moore esq) kids were told pumped water to holding tank up mountain for distribution. 


May 25, 2016 Email Response from Heather McMurray to Site Trustee, Roberto Puga Email Subject Heading: RE: Isotopes at Asarco El Paso site

 May 25, 2016

Email Response from Heather McMurray to Site Trustee, Roberto Puga

Email Subject Heading: RE: Isotopes at Asarco El Paso site

https://www.recastingthesmelter.com/?p=5024


Dear Mr. Puga,

Thank you for responding.


The El Paso ASARCO site DID smelt nuclear control rod materials. That data was given to TCEQ, EPA and US DOJ many years ago.


The clean up Trust was exempt by the bankruptcy court from testing for ANY radioactive materials.


I asked why we have not ever been given the levels of any of the isotopes listed in the attached picture: i.e. ANY radioactive isotopes. You did not answer.


The 1998 EPA US DOJ ASARCO 73 page confidential for settlement purposes only document lists many invoices at the back. The Trust never reviewed that set of invoices, nor were these ever released to anyone.


Equipment was power washed and sold with stipulation that any testing for radioactive material be done by the buyer.


You out-right refused to run free radon tests on site. You out right refused to allow collection of any of the distillation unit’s slag. No one has tested the WWII old lead dump (where the lead smelter’s waste was deposited) for by products of wulfenite smelting.


And these examples are only a few of the many.


There is a COMPLETE absence of data from the people formerly and currently in control of the site concerning these matters.


A COMPLETE silence: NO data.


It is very glaring. What you wrote me does not concern testing for or providing this data to el paso citizens.


You categorically state that no radioactive wastes (not talking NORM) were smelted here, when that is not true. Plus you mention the smelting of NORM waste, which can be more toxic than controlled High level radioactive wastes.


Then you end your reply by stating that the site is not above regulatory levels for radioactivity: have you tested for that and where is your data ?


A single alpha particle is more toxic than the arsenic that is listed as a chemical of concern.


It is unbelievable that you sent me NO DATA in your reply.


It is a complete silence concerning the high level radioactive wastes that ASARCO , engelhard and Dupont sent here for burning. Each of them were U.S. DOE high level radioactive radioactive waste disposal contractors; and, each of them listed as sending illegal materials here for burning.


The nuclear control rod material measurements should come from our government and contractors….NOT from citizen action.


You know that the slag offgases, and that capping with clean soil and asphalt is not protective of long term exposure on that site. And you know that turning the primary arroyo into a dump, when the hugely toxic arsenic bubble exists beneath and according to TCEQ has reached the rio grande, is not protective of our public health.


Selling this site, even to a government body like UTEP, will not make it safe. I believe you know that, Mr. Puga, and I belive you care enough to speak up.


If you do not, then you leave a legacy for your family a hundred years from now of covering up something you could have exposed. That is a sad legacy, followed with the people who will grow up poisoned, with teratogenic birth defects and diseases associated with long term exposure to even low level radioactive wastes.


You have to have known this. I write this letter so future generations will know that buck stopped at your desk;and, that instead of coming clean about ASARCO’s role here as a HLRW (high level radioactive waste) U.S DOE official disposal contractor, you perpetuated the cover up. Not for just Asarco, but for several other such U.S. DOE contractors whom were caught sending illegal wastes here to ASARCO for burning (engelhard and dupont).


This entire site SHOULD NOT BE DEVELOPED.


Sincerely,

H. Mcmurray, m.s. biological sciences

PUBLIC SCOPING MEETING #2 COMMENT AND RESPONSE REPORT Loop 375 Border Highway West Extension Project December 8, 2011

See my comments (mcmurray)

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://ftp.txdot.gov/pub/txdot-info/elp/projects/border_highway_west/summary_120811.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwiXmuCWrJiLAxUfHEQIHfRqOYcQFnoECBEQAQ&usg=AOvVaw0pHCsFDzXhN2_LeaXIys0I


PUBLIC SCOPING MEETING #2 COMMENT AND RESPONSE REPORT

Loop 375 Border Highway West Extension Project

December 8, 2011


"I've been researching ASARCO for seven years now. I have a 
master's in biology, I'm a certified high school science teacher. I 
was a member of Get the Lead Out when we went to the air 
hearing for ASARCO's permit in 2005, and kept researching 
ASARCO working with the group in Sunland Park called the 
Sunland Park Grassroots Environmental Group. 
We discovered that people weren't being told everything about the contamination at ASARCO. And in 2006 I was able to get a 73-
page confidential for settlement purposes only EPA/federal 
Department of Justice/ASARCO document from the -- someone in 
the Department of Justice under a Texas Public Information Act 
request. 
The document told us that in no uncertain terms that ASARCO 
had been running a multistate illegal, unpermitted hazardous 
waste incinerator for almost ten years, maybe longer. We know 
that they ran it between 1991 pre-ConTop -- the ConTop 
furnaces, spelled C-0-N-T-0-P. They had the world's two largest 
ConTop furnaces from -- so from 1991 to 1998. 
Representative Reyes went on record with the El Paso Times 
after I got this document in 2006. He said that ASARCO had paid 
millions on the condition that the details of what it had done 
would never become public. We've been after the details now 
since I got that document in 2006. It's been five years. We've 
dealt with two different EPA administrations, the recent one for 
two years, and we still don't have the details of what they did. 
We are still asking for the manifests that were listed by number --
ID number in that confidential 1998 document. 
If TxDOT, the EPA, TCEQ and other companies and agencies -- for 
instance, Grupo Mexico who bought ASARCO in 1999 -- if all of 
them had to deal with the facts publicly, the details of what 
ASARCO had done, none of this would be possible. None of this 
highway development by or through ASARCO could happen 
without the proper cleanup. In other words, they're getting away 
with ignoring some pretty toxic material, and this happened 
because the federal Department of Justice allowed the ASARCO 
bankruptcy court to skip, go -- to skip or ignore the ASARCO 
liability from the materials it handled between 1991 and 1998. 
They were never discussed during the bankruptcy, never brought up in the bankruptcy and they were never assigned any damage, 
you know, the payment that they had to make to remediate 
these materials. 
It was, as Representative Reyes said, that they had made a deal 
to keep the details secret. And we believe that it's because we 
now know ASARCO was disposing of Department of Energy 
wastes and so were several of the companies caught sending 
materials here to El Paso for illegal incineration. So every time 
they move dirt in this area, every time anyone works in this area, 
anytime anyone drinks water taken from this area we run a risk 
of encountering one of those hazardous wastes that nobody 
wants to talk about and that they refuse to test for. 
What's happening is that they want this land development so bad 
and they want the port of entries developed so badly and the 
railroads to go through and all this development to happen that 
everyone is willing to just ignore the fact that ASARCO burned 
the stuff for nearly ten years, it's here and that ignoring it isn't 
going to make it go away. And if they want to construct these 
highways properly, if the EPA wants to deliver honest science, 
then they will tell us what these materials are instead of 
spending over-- almost $500,000 on testing and not finding 
anything is what's happening with the cleanup. They would 
spend 20,000 to get a complete list of the metals present at the 
site like at least one resident has done here, and they haven't 
done it. 
They refuse to let us get samples of a distillation unit that 
handled the water for the entire plant that was removing low 
level radioactive waste from the plant's process water. And then 
when they demolished it, got rid of it, sold off the metal, 
whatever, then they said to us, Tell us where to test to find this 
stuff. So what they're doing is getting rid of the stuff and making it harder for the average citizen to ever be able to prove the stuff 
is floating around down there. 
And we rely on our government to deliver honest services, to 
provide honest science, to disclose what hazardous materials are 
present, and I was really sad to see on one of these charts that 
some of the options going through or near the ASARCO site claim 
that there weren't hazardous materials present. And I'm like, 
How can they say that? Everything within nine miles of the 
smelter is contaminated. 
And if you look at the ASARCO Tacoma, Washington, smelter, 
their contamination went out 30 miles. So it's a bad situation. We 
do need transportation options, but we should be planning these 
with the knowledge of what we're actually dealing with, not just 
ignoring the problem that is there. 
They're going to end up putting these roads in that they've 
shown here, they've discussed it with city council. Representative 
Pickett said that he would hold ASARCO's feet to the fire and he 
never did. They claim that voters get to vote on these options, 
they claim that this is a public hearing when it's a series of charts 
and you get to make comments and the comments are never 
really -- never really make any impact on these designs. They' do 
what they want to do. 
The area along Executive drive, west of Executive drive, has 
already been platted and building has started there. All that the 
city will recognize it's contaminated with is lead and it goes on 
like that. I don't see how they can build here and protect the 
workers building the highway and protect the residents' children 
who will move into the area and protect the drivers driving 
through from being exposed to this stuff for the next hundred 
years unless they spend the money that they want to spend making this highway on remediation of the site instead. 
I heard that it will cost over 600 million to build all this. Well, why 
aren't they spending the 600 million to clean up the ASARCO site 
correctly and to protect our river from the plume that's 
underneath ASARCO that's impinging upon the canal in the Rio 
Grande as we speak? Why aren't they spending the money that 
way? Why are they bringing more people in, creating a traffic jam 
at this spot by building all these other parts of the outer circle 
around El Paso and leaving this to last so that people -- there's 
this -- going to be a traffic jam. And people will want it built 
simply out of desperation because they can't get anywhere. 
I think that the engineers involved aren't chemical engineers. I 
think that the people in our government who have worked for 
previous administrations and now this one don't care and I think 
that it's wrong to build roads through this, disturb it, have 
railroads going through it, have people living on it. And some day, 
it may take a hundred years but -- you know, it's wrong to disturb 
it. It should be left alone and made into a no man's land until it 
has proper cleanup. 
The EPA wants it demolished -- ASARCO demolished as fast as 
possible, to have it paved over to reduce the chances of our 
exposure, but they won't say exposure to what. They're being 
gagged by what Representative Reyes described, the millions that 
ASARCO paid on that deal to keep the details secret. And yet 
we're being exposed to this stuff and the people who build this 
highway are too and the workers presently cleaning up ASARCO 
are also. And it's a real shame. Why can't we down here along 
the border get the same kind of expertise, the same kind of 
access to science, the same kind of access to well thought out 
projects that consider all their actual information, not just what 
contractors want us to hear? Why on the border is it always this  way? 
It's extremely frustrating to me. This is an environmental sacrifice 
zone, environmental justice zone. It is being ignored by the EPA, 
it's being ignored by the TCEQ and now it's being ignored by 
TxDOT, and it's not being ignored by the community. Some day 
someone's going to be accountable for the children who grow up 
here who will be able to say they've only lived here and they're 
neighbor only lived here and they grew up and they have all 
these horrible things happening to them. And it -- it's just a 
legacy that we don't deserve down here. We don't -- we 
shouldn't have to live with. 
They should be getting this -- the kind -- they should be getting 
public comment before they start to design all this intricate stuff, 
and they're not. It's all about people making money instead of 
spending the money on our future generations, wisely growing 
children who are healthy and removing the costs that we have to 
deal with for children who have behavioral disorders, learning 
disabilities, the social costs that go with that. It's wrong to pass 
those costs on to families just so that contractors can make more 
money planning all this."
  



Holloman air force base pfas

[holloman air force base sent materials to our region for disposal either at asarco or the regional dump]


"New Mexico

Health advisory issued for anyone eating, capturing wildlife at Holloman Lake

by: Dave Burge


Posted: Jan 27, 2025 / 03:25 PM MST


Updated: Jan 27, 2025 / 04:21 PM MST


SHARE

EL PASO, Texas (KTSM) — The New Mexico Department of Health (NMDOH) has issued a health advisory to hunters or anyone who consumed or captured wildlife between 2010 and 2024 from Holloman Lake near Alamogordo, New Mexico.


Holloman Lake, located near Alamogordo, serves as the wastewater reservoir for Holloman Air Force Base.


This follows a new environmental report revealing record-breaking levels of contamination of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) concentrations in plants and wildlife, NMDOH said."


[Those 3 lines published under fair use]


See:

Ecological Research on 

PFAS Contamination of Wildlife at

Holloman Lake

Prepared for

New Mexico Environment Department

Santa Fe, New Mexico

Prepared by

6020 Academy NE, Suite 100

Albuquerque, New Mexico 87109

www.dbstephens.com

DB23.1087

January 8, 2025